FTI vs. FN

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

FTI (TechnipFMC plc) and FN (Fabrinet) are both stocks. FTI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FTI returned 13.30%/yr vs 31.23%/yr for FN. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FTI vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTI achieves a 46.47% return, which is significantly higher than FN's 26.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FTI has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 13.30%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 31.23% annualized return.

FTI

• 1D: -2.75%
• 1M: -8.20%
• YTD: 46.47%
• 6M: 45.94%
• 1Y: 86.16%
• 3Y*: 65.31%
• 5Y*: 50.06%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

FN

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -18.48%
• YTD: 26.02%
• 6M: 20.67%
• 1Y: 115.55%
• 3Y*: 64.45%
• 5Y*: 44.47%
• 10Y*: 31.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTI vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTI TechnipFMC plc	46.47%	54.90%	44.78%	66.07%	105.91%	-15.36%	-55.23%	12.09%	-36.32%	-11.44%
FN Fabrinet	26.02%	107.06%	15.53%	48.44%	8.23%	52.69%	19.66%	26.37%	78.78%	-28.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FTI and FN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010	0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap FTI : $26.71B FN : $20.78B
EPS FTI : $2.59 FN : $11.65
PE Ratio FTI : 25.17 FN : 49.26
PEG Ratio FTI : 0.03 FN : 2.11
PS Ratio FTI : 2.67 FN : 4.90
PB Ratio FTI : 7.94 FN : 9.02
Total Revenue (TTM) FTI : $10.19B FN : $4.24B
Gross Profit (TTM) FTI : $2.75B FN : $509.75M
EBITDA (TTM) FTI : $1.13B FN : $422.55M

Return for Risk

FTI vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTI

FTI Risk / Return Rank: 93
FTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FTI Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FTI Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FN

FN Risk / Return Rank: 86
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTI vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTI	FN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	1.74	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	2.18	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.29	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.60	5.04	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.87	12.51	+4.36

FTI vs. FN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the FN Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTI and FN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTI vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTI drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTI and FN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTI	FN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.74%	-70.46%	-21.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.29%	-23.14%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.94%	-37.47%	+8.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.32%	-38.70%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.71%	-51.11%	-34.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.29%	-23.14%	+7.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.90%	-22.58%	-11.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.08%	9.31%	-4.23%

Volatility

FTI vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is 9.82%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 24.51%. This indicates that FTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTI	FN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.82%	24.51%	-14.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.99%	55.49%	-33.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.91%	67.10%	-35.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.42%	53.82%	-11.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.72%	48.37%	-0.65%

Dividends

FTI vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FN Fabrinet	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTI TechnipFMC plc	0.31%	0.45%	0.69%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	1.38%	2.43%	2.66%	0.42%

Financials

FTI vs. FN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TechnipFMC plc and Fabrinet over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

FTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

FTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTI and FN in my portfolio?

FTI and FN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTI or FN?

FN has higher volatility (24.51%) compared to FTI (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTI dropped -91.74% vs FN's -70.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.