FTI vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FTI or FANG.
Correlation
The correlation between FTI and FANG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FTI vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FTI:
0.29
FANG:
-0.77
FTI:
0.67
FANG:
-0.92
FTI:
1.10
FANG:
0.87
FTI:
0.13
FANG:
-0.71
FTI:
1.23
FANG:
-1.60
FTI:
10.26%
FANG:
18.72%
FTI:
41.68%
FANG:
38.92%
FTI:
-100.00%
FANG:
-88.72%
FTI:
-100.00%
FANG:
-33.05%
Fundamentals
FTI:
$12.52B
FANG:
$40.29B
FTI:
$1.89
FANG:
$16.08
FTI:
15.80
FANG:
8.58
FTI:
3.18
FANG:
1.20
FTI:
1.35
FANG:
3.28
FTI:
4.08
FANG:
1.05
FTI:
$9.27B
FANG:
$12.87B
FTI:
$1.85B
FANG:
$8.81B
FTI:
$1.39B
FANG:
$8.98B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTI achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's -15.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FTI has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 0.67%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.53% annualized return.
FTI
3.36%
19.30%
4.16%
13.08%
40.34%
0.67%
FANG
-15.24%
6.88%
-23.27%
-29.46%
33.41%
8.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FTI vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FTI
FANG
FTI vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FTI vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than FANG's 4.50% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.67% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 2.01% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 4.50% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FTI vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTI drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTI and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FTI vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) have volatilities of 15.16% and 15.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
FTI vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TechnipFMC plc and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTI vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 464.90M and revenue of 2.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 260.40M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.00M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 142.00M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.