FTI vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Performance
FTI vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTI vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 56.74% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | -55.23% | 12.09% | -36.32% | -11.44% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 27.56% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Fundamentals
FTI:
$29.24B
FANG:
$54.48B
FTI:
$2.29
FANG:
$5.75
FTI:
30.47
FANG:
33.15
FTI:
2.96
FANG:
3.68
FTI:
8.69
FANG:
1.47
FTI:
$9.93B
FANG:
$14.98B
FTI:
$1.72B
FANG:
$7.48B
FTI:
$1.40B
FANG:
$7.31B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTI achieves a 56.74% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's 27.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FTI has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 14.15%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.44% annualized return.
FTI
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 56.74%
- 6M
- 75.87%
- 1Y
- 118.03%
- 3Y*
- 73.40%
- 5Y*
- 54.90%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
FANG
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 27.56%
- 6M
- 34.51%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 23.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTI vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
FTI
FANG
FTI vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTI | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.97 | 0.56 | +2.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.34 | 0.98 | +2.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.13 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 0.86 | +3.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.85 | 2.18 | +14.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTI | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 0.56 | +2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 0.62 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.25 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.46 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTI and FANG is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FTI vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than FANG's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.29% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FTI vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTI drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, roughly equal to the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTI and FANG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTI | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.74% | -88.72% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.94% | -26.16% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.36% | -42.10% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.71% | -88.72% | +3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -5.72% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.15% | -19.57% | -14.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.20% | 10.33% | -3.13% |
Volatility
FTI vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 8.16%. This indicates that FTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTI | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.12% | 8.16% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.58% | 20.91% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.98% | 39.22% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.31% | 38.39% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.79% | 48.95% | -1.16% |
Financials
FTI vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TechnipFMC plc and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities