FTEC vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTEC returned 25.57%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for CIBR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTEC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FTEC vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 31.89% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FTEC has outperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 25.57%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively lower 18.49% annualized return.

FTEC

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 18.21%
• YTD: 31.89%
• 6M: 30.74%
• 1Y: 60.87%
• 3Y*: 33.93%
• 5Y*: 22.49%
• 10Y*: 25.57%

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEC vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	31.89%	22.11%	29.40%	53.30%	-29.59%	30.49%	45.83%	48.93%	-0.39%	36.83%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEC and CIBR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.79

The correlation between FTEC and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTEC vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTEC	CIBR
Technology	98.0%	94.0%
Industrials	0.6%	3.5%
Financial Services	0.6%	-
Energy	0.4%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FTEC vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEC

FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 77
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEC vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTEC	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	1.06	+1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	1.56	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.20	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	1.18	+2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.10	2.79	+9.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTEC vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEC and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTEC	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	1.06	+1.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.66	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.04	0.79	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	0.67	+0.32

Drawdowns

FTEC vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTEC	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.95%	-33.89%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.26%	-21.99%	+5.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.30%	-21.99%	-5.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.95%	-33.89%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.95%	-33.89%	-1.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-2.81%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	-8.66%	+3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	9.25%	-4.20%

Volatility

FTEC vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is 6.43%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTEC	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	10.90%	-4.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.14%	20.90%	-4.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.63%	24.50%	-3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.23%	24.95%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.69%	23.60%	+1.09%

FTEC vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTEC vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than CIBR's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	0.32%	0.43%	0.49%	0.77%	0.93%	0.63%	0.83%	1.03%	1.20%	0.96%	1.25%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTEC and CIBR in my portfolio?

FTEC and CIBR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTEC or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FTEC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FTEC or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.57% vs 18.49% for CIBR. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTEC or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTEC or CIBR?

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTEC or CIBR?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

What is the main difference between FTEC and CIBR?

FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.