FTDS vs. CVMC
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC).
FTDS and CVMC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTDS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Dividend Strength Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2006. CVMC is a passively managed fund by Calvert that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2023. Both FTDS and CVMC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FTDS vs. CVMC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTDS vs. CVMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 7.34% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 3.45% |
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 0.08% | 9.52% | 12.57% | 4.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTDS achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than CVMC's 0.08% return.
FTDS
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
CVMC
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTDS vs. CVMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CVMC's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTDS vs. CVMC — Risk / Return Rank
FTDS
CVMC
FTDS vs. CVMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTDS | CVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.73 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.20 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.16 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.05 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 4.92 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTDS | CVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.73 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.51 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTDS and CVMC is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTDS vs. CVMC - Dividend Comparison
FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than CVMC's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 1.64% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.21% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FTDS vs. CVMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTDS drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than CVMC's maximum drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDS and CVMC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTDS | CVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -22.53% | -34.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.98% | -14.14% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -6.77% | +3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -4.34% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.03% | -0.14% |
Volatility
FTDS vs. CVMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) is 2.94%, while Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that FTDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTDS | CVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 5.78% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 10.51% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.99% | 19.89% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 16.54% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 16.54% | +3.60% |