FTDS vs. VIG
FTDS (First Trust Dividend Strength ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTDS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dividend Strength Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTDS returned 11.06%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for VIG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTDS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
FTDS vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTDS having a 7.13% return and VIG slightly lower at 6.98%. Over the past 10 years, FTDS has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 11.06%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.
FTDS
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
VIG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
FTDS vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 7.13% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 11.75% | -13.54% | 24.79% | 14.16% | 24.29% | -10.35% | 20.07% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 6.98% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTDS and VIG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FTDS and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTDS vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTDS
VIG
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FTDS
VIG
Industrials
FTDS
VIG
Energy
FTDS
VIG
Technology
FTDS
VIG
Healthcare
FTDS
VIG
Basic Materials
FTDS
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
FTDS
VIG
Consumer Defensive
FTDS
VIG
Communication Services
FTDS
-
VIG
Real Estate
FTDS
-
VIG
-
Utilities
FTDS
-
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTDS vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
FTDS
VIG
FTDS vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTDS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.34 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 9.44 | -2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTDS vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTDS drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDS and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTDS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -46.81% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -7.91% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -14.95% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -20.39% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -31.72% | -10.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -1.13% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -5.50% | -4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 1.96% | +0.61% |
Volatility
FTDS vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.89%. This indicates that FTDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTDS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 2.89% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 7.70% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 10.14% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 14.23% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 16.04% | +4.09% |
FTDS vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTDS vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 1.65% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTDS and VIG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTDS has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to VIG (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDS dropped -56.53% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.34% vs 11.06% for FTDS. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTDS.
FTDS has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
FTDS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VIG is Dividend. FTDS tracks Dividend Strength Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTDS and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTDS and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer