PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTDS vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTDS vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTDS having a 7.13% return and VIG slightly lower at 6.98%. Over the past 10 years, FTDS has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 11.06%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


FTDS

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
7.13%
6M
6.12%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
11.06%

VIG

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.48%
YTD
6.98%
6M
6.28%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTDS vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
7.13%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.98%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FTDS and VIG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006

0.62

The correlation between FTDS and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTDS vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTDS
VIG

Financial Services

28.4%
19.9%

Industrials

19.6%
11.3%

Energy

19.6%
3.2%

Technology

9.4%
29.0%

Healthcare

9.3%
16.6%

Basic Materials

8.5%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
9.3%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

2.9%

Financial Services

FTDS
28.4%
VIG
19.9%

Industrials

FTDS
19.6%
VIG
11.3%

Energy

FTDS
19.6%
VIG
3.2%

Technology

FTDS
9.4%
VIG
29.0%

Healthcare

FTDS
9.3%
VIG
16.6%

Basic Materials

FTDS
8.5%
VIG
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FTDS
3.4%
VIG
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTDS
1.8%
VIG
9.3%

Communication Services

FTDS

-

VIG
0.5%

Real Estate

FTDS

-

VIG

-

Utilities

FTDS

-

VIG
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTDS vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTDS
FTDS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FTDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTDS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FTDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTDS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTDS vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTDSVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.34

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

9.44

-2.15

FTDS vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTDS and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTDS vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTDS drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDS and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTDSVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-46.81%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-7.91%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-14.95%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-20.39%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-31.72%

-10.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-1.13%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-5.50%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.96%

+0.61%

Volatility

FTDS vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.89%. This indicates that FTDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTDSVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.89%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

7.70%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

10.14%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

14.23%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

16.04%

+4.09%

FTDS vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTDS vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
1.65%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTDS and VIG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTDS has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to VIG (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDS dropped -56.53% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.34% vs 11.06% for FTDS. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTDS.

FTDS has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.

FTDS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VIG is Dividend. FTDS tracks Dividend Strength Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTDS and 0.04% for VIG.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTDS and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer