CVMC vs. SCHH
CVMC (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVMC returned 16.39%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for SCHH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVMC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SCHH.
Performance
CVMC vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than SCHH's 15.41% return.
CVMC
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 6M
- 15.31%
- 1Y
- 26.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 15.41%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
CVMC vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 16.76% | 9.52% | 12.57% | 6.14% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 15.41% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVMC and SCHH is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between CVMC and SCHH shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVMC vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank
CVMC
SCHH
CVMC vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVMC | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.19 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 1.75 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 5.48 | +5.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVMC vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum SCHH drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and SCHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVMC | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.53% | -44.22% | +21.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -8.28% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.53% | -17.76% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.79% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -9.42% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.65% | -0.32% |
Volatility
CVMC vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) is 5.04%, while Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that CVMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVMC | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 5.37% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.15% | 10.42% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 13.89% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 18.77% | -2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 21.02% | -4.48% |
CVMC vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CVMC vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than SCHH's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.21% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.72% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVMC and SCHH have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHH has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to CVMC (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs SCHH's -44.22%.
On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 16.39% vs 12.09% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CVMC has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 16.39% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVMC.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.20% for CVMC.
CVMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHH is REIT. CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.07% for SCHH.
CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVMC and SCHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer