FTDS vs. OPTZ
FTDS (First Trust Dividend Strength ETF) and OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FTDS tracks the Dividend Strength Index while OPTZ tracks the Optimize Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTDS returned 18.68% vs 61.16% for OPTZ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTDS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OPTZ.
Performance
FTDS vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTDS achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 32.54% return.
FTDS
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
OPTZ
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 32.54%
- 6M
- 30.49%
- 1Y
- 61.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTDS vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 7.13% | 13.64% | 5.76% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 32.54% | 22.83% | 16.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTDS and OPTZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FTDS and OPTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTDS vs. OPTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTDS
OPTZ
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FTDS
OPTZ
Industrials
FTDS
OPTZ
Energy
FTDS
OPTZ
Technology
FTDS
OPTZ
Healthcare
FTDS
OPTZ
Basic Materials
FTDS
OPTZ
Consumer Cyclical
FTDS
OPTZ
Consumer Defensive
FTDS
OPTZ
Communication Services
FTDS
-
OPTZ
Real Estate
FTDS
-
OPTZ
Utilities
FTDS
-
OPTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTDS vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank
FTDS
OPTZ
FTDS vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTDS | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.52 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 5.78 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 25.39 | -18.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTDS vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTDS drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than OPTZ's maximum drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDS and OPTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTDS | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -25.75% | -30.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -10.63% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -3.23% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -3.36% | -6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.42% | +0.15% |
Volatility
FTDS vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) is 3.16%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that FTDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTDS | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 9.74% | -6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 16.08% | -7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 19.88% | -6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 21.28% | -3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 21.28% | -1.15% |
FTDS vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTDS vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison
FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than OPTZ's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 1.65% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 0.44% | 0.58% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTDS and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OPTZ has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to FTDS (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDS dropped -56.53% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.
On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 61.16% vs 18.68% for FTDS. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTDS has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 61.16% return vs 18.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTDS.
FTDS has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.44% for OPTZ.
FTDS tracks Dividend Strength Index, while OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTDS and 0.25% for OPTZ.
OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTDS and OPTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer