PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCS vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCS vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCS achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 15.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTCS having a 10.37% annualized return and FDL not far ahead at 10.76%.


FTCS

1D
0.34%
1M
2.84%
6M
2.28%
YTD
5.41%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
10.37%

FDL

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.89%
6M
12.56%
YTD
15.23%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCS vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
5.41%6.46%11.19%8.48%-10.22%26.75%13.05%26.71%-4.22%26.57%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
15.23%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCS and FDL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2006

0.73

The correlation between FTCS and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTCS vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTCS
FDL

Financial Services

20.0%
15.2%

Industrials

19.6%
3.9%

Healthcare

18.5%
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
14.4%

Technology

13.6%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.3%
10.6%

Energy

2.1%
25.7%

Basic Materials

2.1%
0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.5%

Financial Services

FTCS
20.0%
FDL
15.2%

Industrials

FTCS
19.6%
FDL
3.9%

Healthcare

FTCS
18.5%
FDL
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

FTCS
14.2%
FDL
14.4%

Technology

FTCS
13.6%
FDL
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FTCS
7.7%
FDL
4.7%

Communication Services

FTCS
2.3%
FDL
10.6%

Energy

FTCS
2.1%
FDL
25.7%

Basic Materials

FTCS
2.1%
FDL
0.3%

Real Estate

FTCS

-

FDL

-

Utilities

FTCS

-

FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCS vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCS vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCSFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

4.89

-3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

11.11

-8.84

FTCS vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCS and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCS vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCS drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCS and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCSFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-65.93%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-4.27%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.62%

-12.24%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-16.46%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

-41.40%

+9.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-0.89%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-9.62%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.88%

+1.57%

Volatility

FTCS vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is 3.60%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that FTCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCSFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.65%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

8.37%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

11.65%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

14.37%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

17.12%

-1.60%

FTCS vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCS has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCS vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.10%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCS and FDL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to FTCS (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCS dropped -53.64% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 10.76% vs 10.37% for FTCS. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.10% for FTCS.

FTCS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for FTCS and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCS and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer