PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTC vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTC vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTC having a 17.55% return and CIBR slightly lower at 17.49%. Over the past 10 years, FTC has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 15.09%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.


FTC

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.71%
YTD
17.55%
6M
15.09%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
15.09%

CIBR

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
17.49%
6M
15.23%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTC vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
17.55%15.89%26.60%20.72%-23.28%24.43%33.35%28.07%-6.03%25.32%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
17.49%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FTC and CIBR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between FTC and CIBR has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTC vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTC
CIBR

Technology

36.0%
95.4%

Industrials

27.5%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Financial Services

6.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Communication Services

2.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.9%

-

Energy

0.8%

-

Technology

FTC
36.0%
CIBR
95.4%

Industrials

FTC
27.5%
CIBR
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FTC
9.4%
CIBR

-

Healthcare

FTC
8.6%
CIBR

-

Financial Services

FTC
6.5%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

FTC
3.1%
CIBR

-

Communication Services

FTC
2.4%
CIBR
1.9%

Real Estate

FTC
2.0%
CIBR

-

Utilities

FTC
1.9%
CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

FTC
1.9%
CIBR

-

Energy

FTC
0.8%
CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTC vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTC
FTC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTC vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.12

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

0.64

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

1.48

+8.40

FTC vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTC and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTC vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTC drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTC and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.05%

-33.89%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-21.99%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-21.99%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-33.89%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-33.89%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-11.15%

+7.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-8.66%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

9.54%

-6.78%

Volatility

FTC vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) is 9.27%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 11.76%. This indicates that FTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

11.76%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

21.53%

-5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.85%

25.15%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

25.07%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

23.59%

-2.99%

FTC vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTC and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

FTC vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than CIBR's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.49%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.18%0.20%0.32%0.65%0.90%0.00%0.40%0.64%0.35%0.40%0.86%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTC and CIBR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (11.76%) compared to FTC (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTC dropped -54.05% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.88% vs 15.09% for FTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTC and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.18% for FTC.

FTC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FTC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.

FTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTC and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer