PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 8.01%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.


FSTA

1D
0.69%
1M
0.50%
YTD
10.62%
6M
8.66%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
8.97%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
8.01%

DGRO

1D
0.69%
1M
3.48%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.27%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
10.62%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.86%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and DGRO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTA and DGRO has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSTA vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSTA
DGRO

Consumer Defensive

97.6%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
5.4%

Industrials

0.3%
10.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.4%

Healthcare

0.0%
16.5%

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Energy

-

5.1%

Financial Services

-

20.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

22.0%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Consumer Defensive

FSTA
97.6%
DGRO
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FSTA
1.7%
DGRO
5.4%

Industrials

FSTA
0.3%
DGRO
10.4%

Basic Materials

FSTA
0.3%
DGRO
2.4%

Healthcare

FSTA
0.0%
DGRO
16.5%

Communication Services

FSTA

-

DGRO
0.1%

Energy

FSTA

-

DGRO
5.1%

Financial Services

FSTA

-

DGRO
20.6%

Real Estate

FSTA

-

DGRO

-

Technology

FSTA

-

DGRO
22.0%

Utilities

FSTA

-

DGRO
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTADGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.42

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

3.46

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

13.36

-11.80

FSTA vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTADGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-35.10%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-6.47%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-14.03%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-19.31%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

-35.10%

+9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

0.00%

-4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-3.44%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.62%

1.68%

+2.94%

Volatility

FSTA vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.64%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTADGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

2.64%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

6.96%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

9.59%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.15%

13.83%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

16.62%

-2.05%

FSTA vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSTA and DGRO have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSTA vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.15%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTA and DGRO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTA has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.52% vs 8.01% for FSTA. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSTA and DGRO have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.94% for DGRO.

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer