FSRBX vs. SBFAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSRBX (Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio) and SBFAX (1919 Financial Services Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX returned 10.83%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for SBFAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSRBX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for SBFAX.

Performance

FSRBX vs. SBFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRBX achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than SBFAX's -5.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX has outperformed SBFAX with an annualized return of 10.83%, while SBFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.

FSRBX

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 7.55%
• 10Y*: 10.83%

SBFAX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -5.71%
• 6M: -3.47%
• 1Y: -2.84%
• 3Y*: 12.93%
• 5Y*: 1.90%
• 10Y*: 8.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRBX vs. SBFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio	4.61%	11.11%	30.13%	8.48%	-12.61%	38.21%	-11.73%	35.60%	-19.04%	12.72%
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund	-5.71%	4.29%	24.86%	1.50%	-13.99%	30.74%	0.14%	29.11%	-14.94%	14.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRBX and SBFAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999	0.90

The correlation between FSRBX and SBFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSRBX vs. SBFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRBX

FSRBX Risk / Return Rank: 13
FSRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FSRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FSRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FSRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FSRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

SBFAX

SBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2
SBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRBX vs. SBFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSRBX	SBFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	-0.17	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	-0.14	+1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.98	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	-0.22	+1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	-0.51	+4.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSRBX vs. SBFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the SBFAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRBX and SBFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSRBX	SBFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	-0.17	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.10	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.36	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.40	+0.03

Drawdowns

FSRBX vs. SBFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, which is greater than SBFAX's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and SBFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRBX	SBFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.89%	-49.33%	-27.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.60%	-11.03%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.05%	-16.41%	-9.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.95%	-33.94%	-8.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.23%	-43.58%	-7.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.86%	-8.57%	+2.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-9.52%	-3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.91%	4.72%	+1.19%

Volatility

FSRBX vs. SBFAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) at 3.48%. This indicates that FSRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRBX	SBFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	3.48%	+2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.99%	10.10%	+6.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.65%	14.18%	+8.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.87%	19.33%	+7.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.51%	22.82%	+6.69%

FSRBX vs. SBFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than SBFAX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSRBX vs. SBFAX - Dividend Comparison

FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than SBFAX's 15.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio	2.28%	1.47%	4.49%	5.35%	6.12%	3.36%	8.63%	5.90%	32.02%	2.57%	0.76%	5.64%
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund	15.39%	14.51%	10.60%	10.93%	2.40%	4.83%	5.09%	3.84%	1.58%	0.00%	2.93%	7.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSRBX and SBFAX in my portfolio?

FSRBX and SBFAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSRBX or SBFAX?

FSRBX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to SBFAX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRBX dropped -76.89% vs SBFAX's -49.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.