PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
FSRBX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FSRBX vs. FCNTX

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).

FSRBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSRBX or FCNTX.

Correlation

The correlation between FSRBX and FCNTX is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

FSRBX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

FSRBX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FCNTX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FSRBX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSRBX vs. FCNTX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FSRBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSRBX is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
FCNTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCNTX is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSRBX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

FSRBX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while FCNTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio		2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSRBX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

FSRBX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...