FSRBX vs. FITB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB).

FSRBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.

Performance

FSRBX vs. FITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSRBX vs. FITB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio	-4.77%	11.11%	30.13%	8.48%	-12.61%	38.21%	-11.73%	35.60%	-19.04%	12.72%
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp	0.15%	14.75%	27.20%	10.41%	-21.94%	62.46%	-5.43%	35.20%	-20.32%	15.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRBX achieves a -4.77% return, which is significantly lower than FITB's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX has underperformed FITB with an annualized return of 10.57%, while FITB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.

FSRBX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: -4.77%
• 6M: -6.04%
• 1Y: 11.19%
• 3Y*: 20.44%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: 10.57%

FITB

• 1D: 4.92%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 6M: 6.12%
• 1Y: 22.77%
• 3Y*: 25.22%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: 14.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FSRBX vs. FITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRBX

FSRBX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FSRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FSRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FSRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FSRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FITB

FITB Risk / Return Rank: 66
FITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FITB Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FITB Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRBX vs. FITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSRBX	FITB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.77	-0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	1.17	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.17	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	1.19	-0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.46	3.42	-1.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSRBX vs. FITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the FITB Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRBX and FITB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSRBX	FITB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.77	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.26	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.40	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.21	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FSRBX and FITB is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FSRBX vs. FITB - Dividend Comparison

FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than FITB's 3.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio	1.55%	1.47%	4.49%	5.35%	6.12%	3.36%	8.63%	5.90%	32.02%	2.57%	0.76%	5.64%
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp	3.38%	3.29%	3.41%	3.94%	3.84%	2.62%	3.92%	3.06%	3.14%	1.98%	1.97%	2.59%

Drawdowns

FSRBX vs. FITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, smaller than the maximum FITB drawdown of -98.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and FITB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRBX	FITB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.89%	-98.13%	+21.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.60%	-21.21%	+5.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.95%	-51.68%	+9.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.23%	-64.06%	+12.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.30%	-14.89%	+0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.30%	-31.57%	+18.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.00%	7.36%	-1.36%

Volatility

FSRBX vs. FITB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) is 4.78%, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that FSRBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRBX	FITB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	8.87%	-4.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.15%	20.79%	-2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.49%	29.89%	-2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.90%	31.85%	-4.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.52%	36.31%	-6.79%