PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRBX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRBX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRBX achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 11.81%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.


FSRBX

1D
0.17%
1M
4.95%
YTD
9.07%
6M
-1.07%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.81%

FSPSX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.93%
YTD
10.54%
6M
11.05%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRBX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio
9.07%11.11%30.13%8.48%-12.61%38.21%-11.73%35.60%-19.04%12.72%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
10.54%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRBX and FSPSX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.57

The correlation between FSRBX and FSPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRBX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRBX
FSRBX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FSRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRBX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRBXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.15

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

8.05

-3.75

FSRBX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRBX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRBX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRBXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.89%

-33.69%

-43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.60%

-11.39%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-13.58%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.95%

-29.41%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.23%

-33.69%

-17.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

0.00%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-6.53%

-6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

3.04%

+2.90%

Volatility

FSRBX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.93%. This indicates that FSRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRBXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

4.93%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.28%

12.71%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

15.26%

+7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.82%

16.07%

+10.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.52%

16.56%

+12.96%

FSRBX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRBX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than FSPSX's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.85%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%
FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio
2.19%1.47%4.49%5.35%6.12%3.36%8.63%5.90%32.02%2.57%0.76%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRBX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRBX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to FSPSX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRBX dropped -76.89% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRBX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer