FSLCX vs. IWF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSLCX (Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both funds - FSLCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX returned 10.14%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for IWF. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSLCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWF.

Performance

FSLCX vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 10.14%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.

FSLCX

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 6M: 15.55%
• 1Y: 33.11%
• 3Y*: 19.16%
• 5Y*: 6.96%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

IWF

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 25.60%
• 3Y*: 24.80%
• 5Y*: 15.24%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLCX vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund	16.37%	14.95%	9.27%	19.70%	-22.71%	20.26%	13.80%	29.46%	-11.70%	13.78%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	7.11%	18.33%	33.12%	42.59%	-29.31%	27.43%	38.25%	35.86%	-1.67%	29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLCX and IWF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2000	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between FSLCX and IWF has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSLCX vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLCX

FSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 40
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLCX vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSLCX	IWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.67	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.29	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	1.58	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.89	5.28	+4.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSLCX vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLCX and IWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSLCX	IWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	1.67	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.72	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.88	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.40	+0.02

Drawdowns

FSLCX vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, roughly equal to the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and IWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLCX	IWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.22%	-64.25%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.51%	-16.27%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.01%	-23.36%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.04%	-32.72%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.42%	-32.72%	-12.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.66%	+1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.82%	-22.08%	+12.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	4.86%	-1.32%

Volatility

FSLCX vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) at 3.61%. This indicates that FSLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLCX	IWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	3.61%	+2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.79%	11.66%	+2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.37%	15.44%	+2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.97%	21.40%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.23%	20.97%	+0.26%

FSLCX vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IWF's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLCX vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, more than IWF's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund	12.81%	14.91%	1.86%	0.02%	7.91%	22.97%	0.00%	0.31%	26.25%	8.92%	3.85%	10.97%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.33%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLCX and IWF in my portfolio?

FSLCX and IWF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSLCX or IWF?

FSLCX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to IWF (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLCX dropped -61.22% vs IWF's -64.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.