PortfoliosLab logo
FSLCX vs. IWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSLCX and IWM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FSLCX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSLCX:

0.08

IWM:

-0.06

Sortino Ratio

FSLCX:

0.34

IWM:

0.12

Omega Ratio

FSLCX:

1.04

IWM:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

FSLCX:

0.08

IWM:

-0.03

Martin Ratio

FSLCX:

0.34

IWM:

-0.10

Ulcer Index

FSLCX:

8.18%

IWM:

9.38%

Daily Std Dev

FSLCX:

22.27%

IWM:

24.05%

Max Drawdown

FSLCX:

-66.70%

IWM:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

FSLCX:

-24.85%

IWM:

-16.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a -2.06% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's -8.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 0.22%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 6.48% annualized return.


FSLCX

YTD

-2.06%

1M

10.70%

6M

-10.27%

1Y

1.79%

5Y*

4.98%

10Y*

0.22%

IWM

YTD

-8.92%

1M

10.51%

6M

-15.23%

1Y

-0.59%

5Y*

10.21%

10Y*

6.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSLCX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSLCX vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSLCX is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSLCX is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSLCX is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSLCX is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSLCX is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSLCX is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSLCX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLCX and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FSLCX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than IWM's 1.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.31%0.41%0.35%0.02%11.97%0.65%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.23%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%

Drawdowns

FSLCX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -66.70%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FSLCX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) is 6.86%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that FSLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...