FSIG vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSIG (First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSIG is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. FSIG is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FSIG returned 5.12%/yr vs 28.32%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSIG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FSIG vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIG achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.

FSIG

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 5.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIG vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSIG First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF	0.38%	6.66%	4.22%	6.22%	-4.37%	0.02%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	-3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIG and CIBR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021	0.23

Return for Risk

FSIG vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIG

FSIG Risk / Return Rank: 60
FSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIG vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSIG	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.06	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.56	+1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.20	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	1.18	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.44	2.79	+8.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSIG vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIG and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSIG	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	1.06	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.67	+0.29

Drawdowns

FSIG vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIG drawdown since its inception was -6.88%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIG and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSIG	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.88%	-33.89%	+27.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.55%	-21.99%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.55%	-21.99%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-2.81%	+2.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-8.66%	+6.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	9.25%	-8.88%

Volatility

FSIG vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) is 0.83%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FSIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSIG	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	10.90%	-10.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.81%	20.90%	-19.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26%	24.50%	-22.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.96%	24.95%	-21.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.96%	23.60%	-20.64%

FSIG vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSIG vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FSIG First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF	4.81%	4.73%	4.61%	4.42%	2.48%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSIG and CIBR in my portfolio?

FSIG and CIBR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSIG or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FSIG (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIG dropped -6.88% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FSIG or CIBR?

On 3-year performance, CIBR leads with 28.32% vs 5.12% for FSIG. On fees, FSIG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FSIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSIG or CIBR?

Over the 3-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 28.32% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSIG or CIBR?

FSIG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSIG or CIBR?

FSIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between FSIG and CIBR?

FSIG is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CIBR is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FSIG and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.