PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIG vs. BSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIG vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIG achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.42% return.


FSIG

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.20%
6M
0.24%
YTD
0.46%
1Y
2.90%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.70%

BSV

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.22%
6M
0.27%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
1.90%
ALL TIME*
2.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$124.18M$168.72M$200.19M
$5.67M$8.27M$7.61M

FSIG vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSIG
First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF
0.46%6.66%4.22%6.22%-4.37%-0.08%
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.42%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIG and BSV is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

0.85

The correlation between FSIG and BSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIG vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSIG
FSIG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSIG vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSIGBSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.33

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

7.21

+1.14

FSIG vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIG and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSIG vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIG drawdown since its inception was -6.93%, smaller than the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIG and BSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIGBSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.93%

-8.54%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.55%

-1.29%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.55%

-1.53%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.50%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-0.97%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.42%

-0.03%

Volatility

FSIG vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.49%. This indicates that FSIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIGBSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.49%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

1.41%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

1.81%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

2.74%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

2.38%

+0.56%

FSIG vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSIG vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

FSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than BSV's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
3.68%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%
FSIG
First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF
4.84%4.73%4.61%4.42%2.48%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIG and BSV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSIG has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to BSV (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIG dropped -6.93% vs BSV's -8.54%.

On 3-year performance, FSIG leads with 5.09% vs 4.55% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FSIG has performed better with a 5.09% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FSIG.

FSIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 3.68% for BSV.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FSIG and 0.03% for BSV.

BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIG and BSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer