FSAGX vs. RING
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).
FSAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Performance
FSAGX vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSAGX vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 1.81% | 143.05% | 14.97% | -0.37% | -13.46% | -10.44% | 26.83% | 35.50% | -13.00% | 8.63% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 7.25% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | -15.40% | -7.46% | 24.98% | 49.92% | -13.14% | 10.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 7.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 14.04%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 17.97% annualized return.
FSAGX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -25.44%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 84.71%
- 3Y*
- 36.44%
- 5Y*
- 20.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
RING
- 1D
- 6.67%
- 1M
- -20.56%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 22.69%
- 1Y
- 108.05%
- 3Y*
- 48.58%
- 5Y*
- 24.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSAGX vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSAGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSAGX vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank
FSAGX
RING
FSAGX vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSAGX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.33 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 2.52 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 3.64 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 13.06 | -2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSAGX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.33 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.70 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.49 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.12 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSAGX and RING is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSAGX vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than RING's 0.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.62% | 0.99% | 0.36% | 1.60% | 4.40% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 3.57% | 0.00% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.78% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
FSAGX vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, roughly equal to the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and RING.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSAGX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.21% | -79.47% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.85% | -30.11% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.94% | -47.94% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.57% | -52.04% | +1.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.44% | -20.56% | -4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.41% | -47.75% | +14.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 8.38% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FSAGX vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) is 15.39%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 18.16%. This indicates that FSAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSAGX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.39% | 18.16% | -2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.05% | 38.56% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.73% | 46.62% | -3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 35.85% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.05% | 36.85% | -3.80% |