FSAGX vs. FNMIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) and FNMIX (Fidelity New Markets Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FSAGX is a Gold fund managed by Fidelity, while FNMIX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX returned 10.62%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for FNMIX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSAGX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FNMIX.

Performance

FSAGX vs. FNMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than FNMIX's 4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has outperformed FNMIX with an annualized return of 10.62%, while FNMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.96% annualized return.

FSAGX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -3.05%
• YTD: -2.07%
• 6M: -6.88%
• 1Y: 50.39%
• 3Y*: 40.63%
• 5Y*: 16.97%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

FNMIX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 4.03%
• 6M: 4.52%
• 1Y: 15.16%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: 3.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAGX vs. FNMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	-2.07%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	8.63%
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	4.03%	14.86%	6.80%	14.00%	-16.09%	-2.42%	4.62%	10.93%	-7.77%	10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and FNMIX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1993	0.16

The correlation between FSAGX and FNMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. FNMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FNMIX

FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. FNMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSAGX	FNMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	3.48	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	5.79	-4.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.74	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	4.03	-2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.95	17.58	-13.63

FSAGX vs. FNMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FNMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and FNMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. FNMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, which is greater than FNMIX's maximum drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and FNMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAGX	FNMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.21%	-42.76%	-34.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.40%	-3.85%	-31.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.40%	-6.42%	-28.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.94%	-27.16%	-18.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.57%	-27.16%	-23.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.29%	-0.50%	-27.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.34%	-5.68%	-27.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.09%	0.88%	+12.21%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. FNMIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) at 1.25%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAGX	FNMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.04%	1.25%	+15.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.83%	3.65%	+34.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.10%	4.47%	+40.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.10%	6.63%	+27.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.39%	6.92%	+26.47%

FSAGX vs. FNMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FNMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSAGX vs. FNMIX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than FNMIX's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	4.88%	5.07%	4.71%	5.15%	3.93%	3.48%	4.06%	4.87%	4.98%	5.77%	6.93%	4.95%
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.24%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAGX and FNMIX in my portfolio?

FSAGX and FNMIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSAGX or FNMIX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to FNMIX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs FNMIX's -42.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.