FNMIX vs. AAPL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

FNMIX is managed by Fidelity.

Performance

FNMIX vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNMIX vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	-1.02%	14.86%	6.80%	14.00%	-16.09%	-2.42%	4.62%	10.93%	-7.77%	10.16%
AAPL Apple Inc	-6.56%	9.05%	30.71%	49.01%	-26.40%	34.65%	82.31%	88.96%	-5.39%	48.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNMIX achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FNMIX has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 3.90%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.13% annualized return.

FNMIX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -3.77%
• YTD: -1.02%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: 10.89%
• 5Y*: 3.53%
• 10Y*: 3.90%

AAPL

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: -6.56%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 16.20%
• 10Y*: 26.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FNMIX vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNMIX

FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 59
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNMIX vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNMIX	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	0.47	+1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	0.92	+1.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.13	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	0.74	+1.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	2.30	+7.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNMIX vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNMIX and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNMIX	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	0.47	+1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.59	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.91	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.43	+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between FNMIX and AAPL is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FNMIX vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

FNMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	4.66%	5.07%	4.71%	5.15%	3.93%	3.48%	4.06%	4.87%	4.98%	5.77%	6.93%	4.95%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.41%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Drawdowns

FNMIX vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNMIX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNMIX and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNMIX	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.76%	-81.80%	+39.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.12%	-22.99%	+17.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.16%	-33.36%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.16%	-38.52%	+11.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.85%	-11.24%	+7.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-29.71%	+23.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	7.38%	-6.22%

Volatility

FNMIX vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) is 1.70%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that FNMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNMIX	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.70%	5.58%	-3.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.00%	15.09%	-12.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	31.66%	-26.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.55%	27.46%	-20.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.94%	28.94%	-22.00%