PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNMIX vs. FTBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNMIX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNMIX achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FNMIX has outperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 4.02%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.46% annualized return.


FNMIX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.33%
6M
4.81%
1Y
15.76%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
4.02%

FTBFX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.89%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.92%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNMIX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
4.33%14.86%6.80%14.00%-16.09%-2.42%4.62%10.93%-7.77%10.16%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
0.57%7.50%2.13%7.25%-13.58%-0.44%9.34%9.89%-0.66%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FNMIX and FTBFX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2002

0.42

The correlation between FNMIX and FTBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNMIX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNMIX
FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FTBFX
FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNMIX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNMIXFTBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.24

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

1.76

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.75

5.10

+12.65

FNMIX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNMIX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNMIX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNMIX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNMIX and FTBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNMIXFTBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-18.25%

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.85%

-2.89%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.42%

-5.82%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.16%

-18.25%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.16%

-18.25%

-8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.31%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-2.32%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.00%

-0.12%

Volatility

FNMIX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) have volatilities of 1.22% and 1.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNMIXFTBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.21%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

2.88%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

3.80%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

5.67%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

4.73%

+2.19%

FNMIX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNMIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNMIX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

FNMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
4.86%5.07%4.71%5.15%3.93%3.48%4.06%4.87%4.98%5.77%6.93%4.95%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
4.36%4.36%4.15%4.15%2.54%1.89%5.22%3.03%3.19%2.97%3.61%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNMIX and FTBFX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNMIX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to FTBFX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNMIX dropped -42.76% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

FNMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNMIX and FTBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer