PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNMIX vs. EMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNMIX vs. EMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNMIX achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FNMIX has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 3.39%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.84% annualized return.


FNMIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.50%
6M
1.15%
YTD
2.66%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
3.39%
ALL TIME*
8.35%

EMB

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.60%
6M
0.59%
YTD
0.90%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
1.48%
10Y*
2.84%
ALL TIME*
4.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$536.38M$549.68M$593.36M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNMIX vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
2.66%14.86%6.80%14.00%-16.09%-2.42%4.62%10.93%-7.77%10.16%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
0.90%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-5.47%10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FNMIX and EMB is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007

0.66

The correlation between FNMIX and EMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNMIX vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNMIX
FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNMIX vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNMIXEMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.24

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.62

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

6.59

+5.03

FNMIX vs. EMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the EMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNMIX and EMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNMIX vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNMIX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than EMB's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNMIX and EMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNMIXEMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-34.70%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.85%

-4.51%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.87%

-6.91%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.16%

-28.74%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.16%

-28.74%

+1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-1.82%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-5.02%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.10%

-0.17%

Volatility

FNMIX vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) is 0.89%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that FNMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNMIXEMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

1.40%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.60%

4.77%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

5.67%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

9.77%

-3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.88%

9.95%

-3.07%

FNMIX vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNMIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNMIX vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison

FNMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than EMB's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
4.71%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
4.58%5.07%4.71%5.15%3.93%3.48%4.06%4.87%4.98%5.77%6.93%4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNMIX and EMB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMB has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to FNMIX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNMIX dropped -42.76% vs EMB's -34.70%.

FNMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNMIX and EMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer