PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRO vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRO vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 94.26% return, which is significantly higher than FLKR's 61.37% return.


FRO

1D
0.69%
1M
13.46%
6M
48.31%
YTD
94.26%
1Y
135.73%
3Y*
45.97%
5Y*
49.01%
10Y*
26.54%
ALL TIME*
7.04%

FLKR

1D
-2.28%
1M
-15.74%
6M
29.07%
YTD
61.37%
1Y
117.49%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.49M$47.84M$51.57M
$66.00M$77.57M$107.06M

FRO vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
94.26%61.17%-22.48%96.23%73.67%13.67%-41.47%134.59%20.48%-27.49%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
61.37%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FRO and FLKR is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRO vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRO
FRO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRO vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FROFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.36

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.38

3.46

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.21

12.27

+3.93

FRO vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRO Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRO and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRO vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FROFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.36%

-50.06%

-48.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.41%

-34.17%

+12.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.04%

-34.17%

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.04%

-47.97%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.74%

-28.42%

-41.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.85%

-21.96%

-45.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.41%

9.61%

-1.20%

Volatility

FRO vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is 12.24%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.39%. This indicates that FRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FROFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.24%

21.39%

-9.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.26%

50.33%

-17.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.30%

53.42%

-10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.77%

32.16%

+17.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.17%

29.79%

+21.38%

Dividends

FRO vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, more than FLKR's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.86%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
7.95%4.26%13.74%14.31%1.24%0.00%25.72%0.78%0.00%6.54%19.83%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRO and FLKR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to FRO (12.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRO dropped -98.36% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRO and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer