FRDPX vs. FNGAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FRDPX (Franklin Rising Dividends Fund) and FNGAX (Franklin International Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - FRDPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FNGAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, FRDPX returned 11.22%/yr vs 6.02%/yr for FNGAX. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FRDPX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for FNGAX.

Performance

FRDPX vs. FNGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDPX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than FNGAX's -2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDPX has outperformed FNGAX with an annualized return of 11.22%, while FNGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.02% annualized return.

FRDPX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: 6.08%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 1Y: 13.32%
• 3Y*: 11.20%
• 5Y*: 7.71%
• 10Y*: 11.22%
• ALL TIME*: 9.57%

FNGAX

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -2.59%
• 6M: -4.03%
• YTD: -2.08%
• 1Y: -2.60%
• 3Y*: 3.14%
• 5Y*: -4.11%
• 10Y*: 6.02%
• ALL TIME*: 4.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FRDPX vs. FNGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund	8.00%	11.96%	10.92%	12.10%	-10.69%	26.62%	16.29%	29.83%	-5.27%	17.33%
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A	-2.08%	10.48%	0.37%	15.00%	-32.05%	1.17%	32.56%	36.91%	-14.53%	36.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDPX and FNGAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2008	0.66

The correlation between FRDPX and FNGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRDPX vs. FNGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRDPX

FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 38
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FNGAX

FNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3
FNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRDPX vs. FNGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRDPX	FNGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	-0.18	+1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	-0.13	+1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.98	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	-0.19	+1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.82	-0.51	+7.32

FRDPX vs. FNGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the FNGAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDPX and FNGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRDPX vs. FNGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDPX drawdown since its inception was -51.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGAX drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDPX and FNGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRDPX	FNGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.57%	-53.35%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-17.35%	+10.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.26%	-20.13%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.07%	-47.24%	+26.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.89%	-47.24%	+12.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-22.69%	+22.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-14.23%	+8.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	6.52%	-4.70%

Volatility

FRDPX vs. FNGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) is 2.83%, while Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that FRDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRDPX	FNGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	4.90%	-2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	14.81%	-7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.34%	18.24%	-7.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.33%	21.51%	-6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.12%	20.10%	-2.98%

FRDPX vs. FNGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGAX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRDPX vs. FNGAX - Dividend Comparison

FRDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than FNGAX's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A	3.33%	3.36%	1.86%	0.00%	1.75%	1.80%	2.22%	0.13%	1.94%	1.31%	0.53%	0.01%
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund	9.46%	10.25%	10.15%	4.60%	4.96%	4.42%	0.82%	3.01%	5.20%	0.90%	3.09%	5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRDPX and FNGAX in my portfolio?

FRDPX and FNGAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FRDPX or FNGAX?

FNGAX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to FRDPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDPX dropped -51.57% vs FNGAX's -53.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRDPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.