FRDPX vs. EHSTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX).
FRDPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 14, 1987. EHSTX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 23, 1931.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FRDPX or EHSTX.
Key characteristics
| FRDPX | EHSTX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.61% | 17.20% |
| 1Y Return | 18.29% | 24.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.63% | 3.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.02% | 7.25% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.15% | 1.77% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.85 | 2.44 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.38 | 3.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.73 | 2.52 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.39 | 16.55 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.93% | 1.64% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.81% | 11.08% |
| Max Drawdown | -52.49% | -53.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.21% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRDPX and EHSTX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FRDPX vs. EHSTX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FRDPX achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly lower than EHSTX's 17.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDPX has outperformed EHSTX with an annualized return of 8.15%, while EHSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRDPX vs. EHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRDPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EHSTX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FRDPX vs. EHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FRDPX vs. EHSTX - Dividend Comparison
FRDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than EHSTX's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 0.80% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 0.56% | 0.82% | 1.03% | 1.29% | 1.11% | 1.63% | 1.30% | 1.15% | 0.88% |
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 0.91% | 0.98% | 1.10% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.18% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
FRDPX vs. EHSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRDPX drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, roughly equal to the maximum EHSTX drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDPX and EHSTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FRDPX vs. EHSTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) is 3.20%, while Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that FRDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.