PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQAL vs. PFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQAL vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FQAL having a 7.87% return and PFM slightly higher at 8.18%.


FQAL

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.38%
YTD
7.87%
6M
7.86%
1Y
21.12%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*

PFM

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.40%
YTD
8.18%
6M
7.73%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQAL vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
7.87%16.93%21.92%24.20%-19.70%32.13%16.17%28.12%-4.39%23.03%
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
8.18%14.00%16.87%11.40%-6.22%23.08%9.53%26.88%-4.58%17.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FQAL and PFM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.89

The correlation between FQAL and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FQAL vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FQAL
PFM

Technology

34.3%
24.7%

Financial Services

12.3%
18.5%

Communication Services

10.5%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.0%

Industrials

9.1%
11.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
12.0%

Energy

3.9%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.0%

Utilities

2.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.0%

Technology

FQAL
34.3%
PFM
24.7%

Financial Services

FQAL
12.3%
PFM
18.5%

Communication Services

FQAL
10.5%
PFM
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FQAL
10.1%
PFM
4.0%

Industrials

FQAL
9.1%
PFM
11.1%

Healthcare

FQAL
8.9%
PFM
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

FQAL
4.4%
PFM
12.0%

Energy

FQAL
3.9%
PFM
4.7%

Basic Materials

FQAL
2.2%
PFM
3.0%

Utilities

FQAL
2.2%
PFM
4.2%

Real Estate

FQAL
2.2%
PFM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQAL vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQAL
FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PFM
PFM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQAL vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQALPFMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.78

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

11.28

+0.13

FQAL vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQAL and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQALPFMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.09

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.79

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.53

+0.30

Drawdowns

FQAL vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and PFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQALPFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-53.21%

+19.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-7.09%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-14.50%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-17.81%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.23%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-6.94%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.75%

+0.11%

Volatility

FQAL vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that FQAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQALPFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

2.04%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

7.13%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

9.47%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

13.54%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

15.21%

+2.37%

FQAL vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQAL vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
1.12%1.12%1.20%1.35%1.52%1.17%1.46%1.55%1.73%1.53%0.43%0.00%
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
1.33%1.41%1.58%1.86%1.95%1.69%1.92%1.94%2.27%1.70%2.56%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQAL and PFM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQAL has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs PFM's -53.21%.

On 5-year performance, FQAL leads with 12.41% vs 10.63% for PFM. On fees, FQAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FQAL has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FQAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.12% for FQAL.

FQAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.53% for PFM.

PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQAL and PFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer