FQAL vs. JQUA
FQAL (Fidelity Quality Factor ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FQAL tracks the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index while JQUA tracks the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FQAL returned 12.41%/yr vs 13.95%/yr for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FQAL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
FQAL vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.28% return.
FQAL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- —
FQAL vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 7.87% | 16.93% | 21.92% | 24.20% | -19.70% | 32.13% | 16.17% | 28.12% | -4.39% | 4.45% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.28% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -2.98% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FQAL and JQUA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FQAL and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FQAL vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FQAL
JQUA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FQAL
JQUA
Financial Services
FQAL
JQUA
Communication Services
FQAL
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
FQAL
JQUA
Industrials
FQAL
JQUA
Healthcare
FQAL
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
FQAL
JQUA
Energy
FQAL
JQUA
Basic Materials
FQAL
JQUA
Utilities
FQAL
JQUA
Real Estate
FQAL
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FQAL vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
FQAL
JQUA
FQAL vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FQAL | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 2.06 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 2.94 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.23 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 13.63 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FQAL | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.06 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.90 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.83 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FQAL vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, roughly equal to the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQAL | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -32.92% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -7.13% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -16.81% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -22.47% | -3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.17% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -4.16% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.69% | +0.17% |
Volatility
FQAL vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is 2.33%, while JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that FQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FQAL | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.33% | 2.84% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 8.31% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 11.21% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 15.61% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 17.99% | -0.41% |
FQAL vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FQAL vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than JQUA's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 1.12% | 1.12% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.55% | 1.73% | 1.53% | 0.43% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FQAL and JQUA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JQUA has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FQAL (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.95% vs 12.41% for FQAL. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FQAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.95% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FQAL.
FQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.
FQAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.12% for JQUA.
JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FQAL and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer