PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQAL vs. JQUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQAL vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 15.84% return.


FQAL

1D
0.84%
1M
1.78%
6M
8.19%
YTD
10.44%
1Y
19.76%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.54%

JQUA

1D
0.79%
1M
1.13%
6M
13.59%
YTD
15.84%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.01M$3.41M$3.27M
$27.54M$28.89M$36.27M

FQAL vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
10.44%16.93%21.92%24.20%-19.70%32.13%16.17%28.12%-4.39%4.04%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
15.84%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%28.47%-2.98%5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FQAL and JQUA is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FQAL and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FQAL vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FQAL
JQUA

Technology

36.7%
41.0%

Financial Services

12.0%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.5%

Industrials

9.4%
8.9%

Communication Services

9.3%
6.2%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.2%

Energy

3.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.2%

Utilities

2.0%
1.2%

Technology

FQAL
36.7%
JQUA
41.0%

Financial Services

FQAL
12.0%
JQUA
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FQAL
9.6%
JQUA
9.5%

Industrials

FQAL
9.4%
JQUA
8.9%

Communication Services

FQAL
9.3%
JQUA
6.2%

Healthcare

FQAL
9.1%
JQUA
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

FQAL
4.4%
JQUA
5.2%

Energy

FQAL
3.3%
JQUA
3.3%

Basic Materials

FQAL
2.1%
JQUA
1.7%

Real Estate

FQAL
2.1%
JQUA
2.2%

Utilities

FQAL
2.0%
JQUA
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQAL vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FQAL
FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FQAL vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQALJQUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.27

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

13.35

-2.94

FQAL vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQAL and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQAL vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, roughly equal to the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and JQUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQALJQUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-32.92%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-7.13%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-16.81%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-22.47%

-3.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-4.10%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.74%

+0.16%

Volatility

FQAL vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQALJQUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

2.46%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

9.45%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

12.01%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

15.73%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

17.92%

-0.43%

FQAL vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQAL vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than JQUA's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
1.14%1.12%1.20%1.35%1.52%1.17%1.46%1.55%1.73%1.53%0.43%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQAL and JQUA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQAL has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to JQUA (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.98% vs 11.53% for FQAL. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FQAL.

FQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.

FQAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.12% for JQUA.

JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQAL and JQUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer