PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPXI vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPXI vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPXI achieves a 38.06% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 18.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FPXI has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 13.94%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.93% annualized return.


FPXI

1D
-5.63%
1M
8.84%
YTD
38.06%
6M
35.72%
1Y
51.16%
3Y*
29.56%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
13.94%

CIBR

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
18.06%
6M
15.86%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
17.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPXI vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
38.06%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%33.69%-13.07%39.32%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
18.06%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FPXI and CIBR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.59

The correlation between FPXI and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPXI vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPXI
CIBR

Technology

37.3%
95.4%

Industrials

21.5%
2.7%

Basic Materials

13.2%

-

Healthcare

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%

-

Financial Services

4.2%

-

Communication Services

2.2%
1.9%

Energy

2.1%

-

Utilities

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.7%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Technology

FPXI
37.3%
CIBR
95.4%

Industrials

FPXI
21.5%
CIBR
2.7%

Basic Materials

FPXI
13.2%
CIBR

-

Healthcare

FPXI
10.9%
CIBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FPXI
6.5%
CIBR

-

Financial Services

FPXI
4.2%
CIBR

-

Communication Services

FPXI
2.2%
CIBR
1.9%

Energy

FPXI
2.1%
CIBR

-

Utilities

FPXI
1.0%
CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

FPXI
0.7%
CIBR

-

Real Estate

FPXI
0.5%
CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPXI vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPXI vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPXICIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.12

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

0.69

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

1.60

+10.05

FPXI vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPXI Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPXI and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPXI vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPXI drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXI and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXICIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-33.89%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-21.99%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-21.99%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.75%

-33.89%

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.78%

-33.89%

-21.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-10.72%

+5.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.17%

-8.66%

-11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

9.51%

-5.11%

Volatility

FPXI vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a higher volatility of 13.69% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 12.03%. This indicates that FPXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXICIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.69%

12.03%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

21.54%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.63%

25.21%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

25.07%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

23.60%

-2.14%

FPXI vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPXI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPXI vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than CIBR's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.49%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.58%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPXI and CIBR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to CIBR (12.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPXI dropped -55.78% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.93% vs 13.94% for FPXI. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CIBR has been the lower-risk option at 12.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 13.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

FPXI has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.49% for CIBR.

FPXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FPXI tracks IPOX International Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FPXI and 0.60% for CIBR.

FPXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPXI and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer