FPXI vs. CIBR
FPXI (First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPXI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the IPOX International Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FPXI returned 11.04%/yr vs 18.36%/yr for CIBR. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FPXI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
FPXI vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPXI achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 31.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FPXI has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 11.04%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.36% annualized return.
FPXI
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.39%
CIBR
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 35.30%
- YTD
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 31.99%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 18.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $124.81M | $136.12M | $141.72M | |
| $2.73M | $3.76M | $4.60M |
FPXI vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 16.79% | 26.37% | 12.62% | 9.56% | -31.83% | -15.73% | 71.50% | 33.69% | -13.07% | 39.32% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 31.78% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPXI and CIBR is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FPXI and CIBR has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FPXI vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPXI
CIBR
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FPXI
CIBR
Industrials
FPXI
CIBR
Healthcare
FPXI
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
FPXI
CIBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
FPXI
CIBR
-
Financial Services
FPXI
CIBR
-
Energy
FPXI
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
FPXI
CIBR
-
Communication Services
FPXI
CIBR
Utilities
FPXI
CIBR
-
Real Estate
FPXI
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPXI vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FPXI
CIBR
FPXI vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPXI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.46 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 3.38 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPXI vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPXI drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXI and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPXI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -33.89% | -21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.12% | -21.99% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.12% | -21.99% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.75% | -33.89% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.78% | -33.89% | -21.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.17% | -0.87% | -19.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -8.62% | -11.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 9.49% | -2.79% |
Volatility
FPXI vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 7.60%. This indicates that FPXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPXI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 7.60% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.10% | 22.41% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.35% | 26.03% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 25.31% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 23.65% | -1.74% |
FPXI vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPXI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPXI vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than CIBR's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.42% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.68% | 0.70% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 1.13% | 0.71% | 0.18% | 0.67% | 1.75% | 0.75% | 2.09% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPXI and CIBR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPXI has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to CIBR (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPXI dropped -55.78% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.36% vs 11.04% for FPXI. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CIBR has been the lower-risk option at 7.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.36% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.
FPXI has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.42% for CIBR.
FPXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FPXI tracks IPOX International Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FPXI and 0.60% for CIBR.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPXI and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer