FPWR vs. CIBR
FPWR (First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPWR is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. FPWR is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPWR returned 12.01%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FPWR charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
FPWR vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPWR achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 21.55% return.
FPWR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 21.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 23.56%
- YTD
- 21.55%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.73%
FPWR vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 12.96% | 16.78% | 22.60% | -3.36% | 5.28% | 12.26% | 8.98% | 5.66% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 21.55% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPWR and CIBR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2019 | 0.32 |
The correlation between FPWR and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPWR vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FPWR
CIBR
FPWR vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPWR | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.15 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 0.87 | +3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 2.05 | +9.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPWR | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 0.77 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.60 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.64 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
FPWR vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPWR drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, roughly equal to the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPWR and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPWR | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -33.89% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | -21.99% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -21.99% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.88% | -33.89% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -8.08% | +5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -8.66% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 9.27% | -7.40% |
Volatility
FPWR vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) is 3.75%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that FPWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPWR | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 12.36% | -8.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 21.41% | -13.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 24.91% | -14.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 25.02% | -10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 23.64% | -6.24% |
FPWR vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPWR has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPWR vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than CIBR's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPWR and CIBR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to FPWR (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPWR dropped -32.28% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 14.99% vs 12.01% for FPWR. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FPWR has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 12.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for FPWR.
FPWR has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.47% for CIBR.
FPWR is categorized as Utilities Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for FPWR and 0.60% for CIBR.
FPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPWR and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer