FPWR vs. BILT
FPWR (First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPWR charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
FPWR vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FPWR having a 15.51% return and BILT slightly lower at 14.83%.
FPWR
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 15.06%
- 1Y
- 23.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- —
BILT
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPWR vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 15.51% | 1.62% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 14.83% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPWR and BILT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPWR vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
FPWR
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FPWR vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPWR vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPWR drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPWR and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -5.38% | -26.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.24% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -1.44% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility
FPWR vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.57% | 10.27% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 10.27% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 10.27% | +7.08% |
FPWR vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPWR has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPWR vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
FPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than BILT's 5.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.67% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 1.89% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPWR and BILT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for FPWR.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 2.26% for FPWR.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for FPWR and 0.60% for BILT.
Find the right allocation for FPWR and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer