FPRO vs. ONEQ
FPRO (Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPRO is a REIT fund actively managed by Fidelity, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. FPRO is actively managed, while ONEQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPRO returned 3.13%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for ONEQ. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FPRO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.
Performance
FPRO vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPRO achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 16.16% return.
FPRO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 39.62%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 19.68%
FPRO vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF | 9.97% | 2.60% | 5.63% | 10.93% | -25.02% | 40.13% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 16.16% | 20.89% | 29.30% | 45.73% | -32.12% | 14.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPRO and ONEQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FPRO and ONEQ has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FPRO vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPRO
ONEQ
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
FPRO
ONEQ
Communication Services
FPRO
ONEQ
Basic Materials
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Consumer Cyclical
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Consumer Defensive
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Energy
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Financial Services
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Healthcare
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Industrials
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Technology
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Utilities
FPRO
-
ONEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPRO vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank
FPRO
ONEQ
FPRO vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPRO | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.15 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 12.46 | -8.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPRO | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.48 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.70 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.65 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
FPRO vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPRO drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPRO and ONEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPRO | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.81% | -55.09% | +22.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -12.64% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | -24.09% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.81% | -35.23% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | -0.85% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.66% | -7.95% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.19% | -0.52% |
Volatility
FPRO vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) is 3.54%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that FPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPRO | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 4.20% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 11.96% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 16.05% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 22.14% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 21.71% | -3.34% |
FPRO vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPRO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPRO vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
FPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF | 2.57% | 2.69% | 2.50% | 2.83% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPRO and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FPRO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPRO dropped -32.81% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.
On 5-year performance, ONEQ leads with 15.43% vs 3.13% for FPRO. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, FPRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPRO.
FPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.67% for ONEQ.
FPRO is categorized as REIT, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPRO and 0.21% for ONEQ.
ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPRO and ONEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer