PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPRO vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPRO achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 16.16% return.


FPRO

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
9.97%
6M
9.24%
1Y
10.32%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*

ONEQ

1D
-0.85%
1M
7.21%
YTD
16.16%
6M
15.18%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
27.68%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
19.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
9.97%2.60%5.63%10.93%-25.02%40.13%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
16.16%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FPRO and ONEQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between FPRO and ONEQ has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPRO
ONEQ

Real Estate

99.4%
0.6%

Communication Services

0.6%
16.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.2%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Industrials

-

2.9%

Technology

-

50.8%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Real Estate

FPRO
99.4%
ONEQ
0.6%

Communication Services

FPRO
0.6%
ONEQ
16.7%

Basic Materials

FPRO

-

ONEQ
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FPRO

-

ONEQ
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

FPRO

-

ONEQ
5.2%

Energy

FPRO

-

ONEQ
0.6%

Financial Services

FPRO

-

ONEQ
3.1%

Healthcare

FPRO

-

ONEQ
5.1%

Industrials

FPRO

-

ONEQ
2.9%

Technology

FPRO

-

ONEQ
50.8%

Utilities

FPRO

-

ONEQ
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPRO vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPRO
FPRO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPROONEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.15

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

12.46

-8.59

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPRO and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPROONEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.48

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.70

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.65

-0.30

Drawdowns

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPRO drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPRO and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPROONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.81%

-55.09%

+22.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-12.64%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-24.09%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.81%

-35.23%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-0.85%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-7.95%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.19%

-0.52%

Volatility

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) is 3.54%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that FPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPROONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.20%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

11.96%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

16.05%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

22.14%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

21.71%

-3.34%

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPRO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPRO vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

FPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
2.57%2.69%2.50%2.83%2.67%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.67%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPRO and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FPRO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPRO dropped -32.81% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

On 5-year performance, ONEQ leads with 15.43% vs 3.13% for FPRO. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, FPRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPRO.

FPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.67% for ONEQ.

FPRO is categorized as REIT, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPRO and 0.21% for ONEQ.

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPRO and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer