FPFD vs. ONEQ
FPFD (Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPFD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. FPFD is actively managed, while ONEQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FPFD returned 7.66%/yr vs 27.68%/yr for ONEQ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FPFD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.
Performance
FPFD vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPFD achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 16.16% return.
FPFD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 39.62%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 19.68%
FPFD vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 0.73% | 6.46% | 8.50% | 10.91% | -17.11% | 1.89% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 16.16% | 20.89% | 29.30% | 45.73% | -32.12% | 11.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPFD and ONEQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.42 |
The correlation between FPFD and ONEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FPFD vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPFD
ONEQ
Financial Services
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FPFD
ONEQ
Utilities
FPFD
ONEQ
Communication Services
FPFD
ONEQ
Real Estate
FPFD
ONEQ
Technology
FPFD
ONEQ
Industrials
FPFD
ONEQ
Consumer Cyclical
FPFD
ONEQ
Basic Materials
FPFD
-
ONEQ
Consumer Defensive
FPFD
-
ONEQ
Energy
FPFD
-
ONEQ
Healthcare
FPFD
-
ONEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPFD vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank
FPFD
ONEQ
FPFD vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPFD | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.15 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 12.46 | -3.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPFD | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.48 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.65 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
FPFD vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPFD drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFD and ONEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPFD | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -55.09% | +34.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -12.64% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.92% | -24.09% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.85% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -7.95% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 3.19% | -2.46% |
Volatility
FPFD vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is 1.00%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that FPFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPFD | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 4.20% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 11.96% | -9.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | 16.05% | -13.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 22.14% | -16.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 21.71% | -16.39% |
FPFD vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPFD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPFD vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
FPFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 5.15% | 5.04% | 4.89% | 5.09% | 5.22% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPFD and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FPFD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFD dropped -20.83% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.
On 3-year performance, ONEQ leads with 27.68% vs 7.66% for FPFD. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 27.68% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPFD.
FPFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.67% for ONEQ.
FPFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPFD and 0.21% for ONEQ.
ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPFD and ONEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer