PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPFD vs. RDFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPFD vs. RDFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPFD achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than RDFI's 2.38% return.


FPFD

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.39%
6M
-0.64%
YTD
0.52%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.64%

RDFI

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.32%
6M
-0.24%
YTD
2.38%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$213.95K$288.57K$327.68K
$296.48K$345.49K$313.16K

FPFD vs. RDFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
0.52%6.46%8.50%10.91%-17.11%1.84%
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
2.38%9.83%13.15%8.57%-17.06%0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FPFD and RDFI is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.54

The correlation between FPFD and RDFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPFD vs. RDFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FPFD
FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

RDFI
RDFI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RDFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RDFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FPFD vs. RDFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPFDRDFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.88

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

3.11

+0.67

FPFD vs. RDFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the RDFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPFD and RDFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPFD vs. RDFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPFD drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum RDFI drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFD and RDFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPFDRDFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-23.71%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-8.01%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.92%

-9.22%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

-23.71%

+2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-2.44%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-7.06%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.26%

-1.38%

Volatility

FPFD vs. RDFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is 0.80%, while Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that FPFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPFDRDFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

2.37%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

6.53%

-4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

7.37%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.31%

8.19%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

7.93%

-2.67%

FPFD vs. RDFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPFD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than RDFI's 3.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPFD vs. RDFI - Dividend Comparison

FPFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than RDFI's 8.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.27%5.04%4.89%5.09%5.22%1.59%0.00%
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
8.30%8.17%8.14%7.38%4.70%6.78%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPFD and RDFI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDFI has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to FPFD (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFD dropped -20.83% vs RDFI's -23.71%.

On 5-year performance, RDFI leads with 2.78% vs 1.42% for FPFD. On fees, FPFD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RDFI has performed better with a 2.78% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPFD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 3.69% for RDFI.

RDFI has the higher dividend yield at 8.30%, compared with 5.27% for FPFD.

FPFD is categorized as Preferred Stock, while RDFI is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Rareview. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPFD and 3.69% for RDFI.

FPFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPFD and RDFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer