FPE vs. CWB
FPE (First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF) and CWB (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. FPE is actively managed, while CWB is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FPE returned 5.04%/yr vs 12.92%/yr for CWB. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FPE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CWB.
Performance
FPE vs. CWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPE achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than CWB's 23.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FPE has underperformed CWB with an annualized return of 5.04%, while CWB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.92% annualized return.
FPE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
CWB
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 23.48%
- 6M
- 22.61%
- 1Y
- 38.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
FPE vs. CWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPE First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 0.97% | 9.21% | 11.17% | 6.84% | -12.77% | 5.24% | 6.00% | 18.15% | -4.98% | 11.26% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 23.48% | 16.61% | 10.06% | 14.49% | -20.81% | 2.18% | 53.39% | 22.39% | -2.00% | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPE and CWB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013 | 0.42 |
The correlation between FPE and CWB shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FPE vs. CWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPE
CWB
Financial Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
FPE
CWB
-
Utilities
FPE
CWB
Real Estate
FPE
CWB
-
Consumer Defensive
FPE
CWB
-
Communication Services
FPE
CWB
Industrials
FPE
CWB
Basic Materials
FPE
-
CWB
-
Consumer Cyclical
FPE
-
CWB
Energy
FPE
-
CWB
-
Healthcare
FPE
-
CWB
Technology
FPE
-
CWB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPE vs. CWB — Risk / Return Rank
FPE
CWB
FPE vs. CWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPE | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 2.74 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 3.63 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.49 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 5.14 | -3.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 18.58 | -9.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPE | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.74 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.90 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.92 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
FPE vs. CWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPE drawdown since its inception was -33.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CWB drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPE and CWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPE | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.35% | -32.06% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -7.52% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | -11.92% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -28.41% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.35% | -32.06% | -1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.16% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -6.17% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 2.08% | -1.18% |
Volatility
FPE vs. CWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) is 1.10%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that FPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPE | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 5.33% | -4.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 11.43% | -8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 14.10% | -10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 12.95% | -6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 14.47% | -4.30% |
FPE vs. CWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CWB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPE vs. CWB - Dividend Comparison
FPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than CWB's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% |
FPE First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 5.84% | 5.81% | 5.68% | 6.03% | 5.67% | 4.48% | 4.88% | 5.32% | 6.14% | 5.39% | 5.97% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPE and CWB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWB has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to FPE (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPE dropped -33.35% vs CWB's -32.06%.
On 10-year performance, CWB leads with 12.92% vs 5.04% for FPE. On fees, CWB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FPE has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CWB has performed better with a 12.92% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FPE.
FPE has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 1.35% for CWB.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FPE and 0.40% for CWB.
CWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPE and CWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer