PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPE vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPE vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPE achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FPE has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 5.04%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.


FPE

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.26%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
5.04%

CIBR

1D
-2.81%
1M
31.43%
YTD
28.52%
6M
24.03%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPE vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPE
First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF
0.97%9.21%11.17%6.84%-12.77%5.24%6.00%18.15%-4.98%11.26%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
28.52%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FPE and CIBR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.38

The correlation between FPE and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPE vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPE
CIBR

Financial Services

9.2%

-

Utilities

3.1%

-

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Communication Services

0.4%
2.6%

Industrials

0.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

94.0%

Financial Services

FPE
9.2%
CIBR

-

Utilities

FPE
3.1%
CIBR

-

Real Estate

FPE
2.3%
CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

FPE
0.8%
CIBR

-

Communication Services

FPE
0.4%
CIBR
2.6%

Industrials

FPE
0.4%
CIBR
3.5%

Basic Materials

FPE

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FPE

-

CIBR

-

Energy

FPE

-

CIBR

-

Healthcare

FPE

-

CIBR

-

Technology

FPE

-

CIBR
94.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPE vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPE
FPE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPE vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPECIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.20

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.18

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

2.79

+6.68

FPE vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPE and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPECIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.06

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.66

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.79

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.67

-0.14

Drawdowns

FPE vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPE drawdown since its inception was -33.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPE and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPECIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.35%

-33.89%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-21.99%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-21.99%

+17.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.65%

-33.89%

+14.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.35%

-33.89%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-2.81%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-8.66%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

9.25%

-8.35%

Volatility

FPE vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) is 1.10%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPECIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

10.90%

-9.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

20.90%

-17.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

24.50%

-20.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

24.95%

-18.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

23.60%

-13.43%

FPE vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPE vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
FPE
First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.84%5.81%5.68%6.03%5.67%4.48%4.88%5.32%6.14%5.39%5.97%5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPE and CIBR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FPE (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPE dropped -33.35% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.49% vs 5.04% for FPE. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FPE has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FPE.

FPE has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

FPE is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CIBR is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FPE and 0.60% for CIBR.

FPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPE and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer