FOWF vs. QDPL
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer. FOWF is passively managed, while QDPL is actively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 33.76% for QDPL. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QDPL.
Performance
FOWF vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than QDPL's 4.06% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDPL
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOWF vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 4.06% | 16.52% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and QDPL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FOWF and QDPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
QDPL
FOWF vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 2.64 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 3.71 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.49 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 3.48 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 16.20 | -2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.64 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.76 | +1.02 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and QDPL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -22.59% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -8.65% | -1.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | 0.00% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -5.27% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.85% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 5.62%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 5.62% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 9.53% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 12.89% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 15.13% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 15.13% | +1.86% |
FOWF vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than QDPL's 4.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 4.72% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% |