PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOWF vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOWF vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.79% return.


FOWF

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.81%
6M
10.69%
1Y
37.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IGF

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
9.79%
6M
10.68%
1Y
26.95%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOWF vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
8.81%29.15%0.39%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
9.79%21.31%2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FOWF and IGF is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOWF vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOWF
FOWF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FOWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOWF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FOWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOWF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOWF vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOWFIGFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

2.68

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.02

3.75

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.48

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

4.72

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.92

18.32

-4.40

FOWF vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOWF Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOWF and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOWFIGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.68

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.24

+1.53

Drawdowns

FOWF vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and IGF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FOWFIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-58.33%

+46.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-5.87%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-2.88%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-11.93%

+10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.51%

+1.11%

Volatility

FOWF vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 4.05%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FOWFIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

4.05%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

7.51%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

10.13%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

13.90%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

16.79%

+0.20%

FOWF vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOWF vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than IGF's 2.94% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
0.73%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.94%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%