FOWF vs. IGF
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds — FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index while IGF tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 26.95% for IGF. At 0.46, their price movements are largely independent. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
FOWF vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.79% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 26.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
FOWF vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.79% | 21.31% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and IGF is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
IGF
FOWF vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 2.68 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 3.75 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.48 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.72 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 18.32 | -4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.68 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.24 | +1.53 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and IGF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -58.33% | +46.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -5.87% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -2.88% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -11.93% | +10.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.51% | +1.11% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 4.05%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 4.05% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 7.51% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 10.13% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 13.90% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 16.79% | +0.20% |
FOWF vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than IGF's 2.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.94% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |