FOWF vs. GCOW
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 35.15% for GCOW. At 0.42, their price movements are largely independent. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
FOWF vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.40% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 12.40%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 35.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
FOWF vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.40% | 27.34% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and GCOW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
GCOW
FOWF vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 3.30 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 4.73 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.58 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 7.80 | -4.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 23.22 | -9.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 3.30 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.59 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -37.64% | +25.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -4.77% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -2.54% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -5.88% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.60% | +1.02% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.83%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 2.83% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 7.70% | +3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 10.83% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 13.48% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 16.22% | +0.77% |
FOWF vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.43% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |