PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOUR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FOUR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FOUR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
-30.55%-39.32%39.60%32.92%-3.45%-23.17%124.81%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-5.93%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%31.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOUR achieves a -30.55% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -5.93% return.


FOUR

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
-30.55%
6M
-43.50%
1Y
-46.48%
3Y*
-16.75%
5Y*
-12.87%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
3.39%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.93%
6M
-3.62%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOUR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOUR
FOUR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FOUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOUR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FOUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOUR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOUR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOURQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.85

1.05

-1.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.20

1.63

-2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.23

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

1.88

-2.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.57

6.95

-8.52

FOUR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOUR Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOUR and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOURQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

1.05

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.58

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.37

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between FOUR and QQQ is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FOUR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FOUR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Drawdowns

FOUR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOUR drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOUR and QQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FOURQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.95%

-82.97%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.45%

-12.62%

-48.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.95%

-35.12%

-34.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.20%

-8.98%

-56.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.53%

-32.99%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.73%

3.41%

+27.32%

Volatility

FOUR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) has a higher volatility of 26.27% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.51%. This indicates that FOUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FOURQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.27%

6.51%

+19.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.91%

12.77%

+29.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.77%

22.67%

+32.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.00%

22.39%

+33.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.36%

22.25%

+35.11%