PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FOUR vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FOUR and BABA is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

FOUR vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
57.96%
10.12%
FOUR
BABA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FOUR:

1.01

BABA:

0.42

Sortino Ratio

FOUR:

1.60

BABA:

0.91

Omega Ratio

FOUR:

1.21

BABA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

FOUR:

1.07

BABA:

0.20

Martin Ratio

FOUR:

3.09

BABA:

1.17

Ulcer Index

FOUR:

14.79%

BABA:

13.48%

Daily Std Dev

FOUR:

45.51%

BABA:

37.28%

Max Drawdown

FOUR:

-69.95%

BABA:

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

FOUR:

-7.34%

BABA:

-73.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FOUR:

$9.60B

BABA:

$201.09B

EPS

FOUR:

$1.80

BABA:

$4.81

PE Ratio

FOUR:

59.17

BABA:

17.56

PEG Ratio

FOUR:

0.87

BABA:

0.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

FOUR:

$2.44B

BABA:

$722.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FOUR:

$595.40M

BABA:

$283.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

FOUR:

-$621.50M

BABA:

$134.49B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOUR achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -1.30% return.


FOUR

YTD

2.63%

1M

3.51%

6M

57.96%

1Y

45.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BABA

YTD

-1.30%

1M

-9.35%

6M

10.10%

1Y

17.19%

5Y*

-17.55%

10Y*

-1.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FOUR vs. BABA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOUR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FOUR is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FOUR is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FOUR is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FOUR is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FOUR is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FOUR is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABA is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABA is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABA is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABA is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABA is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABA is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FOUR vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FOUR, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.010.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for FOUR, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.600.91
The chart of Omega ratio for FOUR, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.211.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for FOUR, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.070.20
The chart of Martin ratio for FOUR, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.003.091.17
FOUR
BABA

The current FOUR Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOUR and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.01
0.42
FOUR
BABA

Dividends

FOUR vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

FOUR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.


TTM20242023
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.79%0.78%1.29%

Drawdowns

FOUR vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOUR drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOUR and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.34%
-73.03%
FOUR
BABA

Volatility

FOUR vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) have volatilities of 10.26% and 10.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.26%
10.20%
FOUR
BABA

Financials

FOUR vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shift4 Payments, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab