PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOUR vs. PAYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FOUR vs. PAYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) and Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOUR achieves a -36.13% return, which is significantly lower than PAYC's -13.06% return.


FOUR

1D
-7.09%
1M
-8.57%
YTD
-36.13%
6M
-42.62%
1Y
-57.74%
3Y*
-15.09%
5Y*
-15.79%
10Y*

PAYC

1D
-4.47%
1M
4.49%
YTD
-13.06%
6M
-15.81%
1Y
-47.28%
3Y*
-21.63%
5Y*
-15.20%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOUR vs. PAYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
-36.13%-39.32%39.60%32.92%-3.45%-23.17%124.81%
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
-13.06%-21.70%-0.04%-33.06%-25.26%-8.19%37.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FOUR and PAYC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020

0.46

The correlation between FOUR and PAYC shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FOUR:

$2.96B

PAYC:

$7.05B

EPS

FOUR:

$1.07

PAYC:

$8.58

PE Ratio

FOUR:

37.49

PAYC:

16.06

PEG Ratio

FOUR:

1.52

PAYC:

0.60

PS Ratio

FOUR:

0.97

PAYC:

3.60

PB Ratio

FOUR:

4.57

PAYC:

8.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

FOUR:

$3.33B

PAYC:

$2.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FOUR:

$1.17B

PAYC:

$1.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

FOUR:

$503.40M

PAYC:

$803.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOUR vs. PAYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOUR
FOUR Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FOUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOUR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FOUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOUR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PAYC
PAYC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PAYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOUR vs. PAYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) and Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOURPAYCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.08

-1.26

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.76

-1.95

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.77

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

-0.83

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.47

-1.26

-0.21

FOUR vs. PAYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOUR Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is comparable to the PAYC Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOUR and PAYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOURPAYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

-1.26

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

-0.34

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.44

-0.39

Drawdowns

FOUR vs. PAYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOUR drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum PAYC drawdown of -78.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOUR and PAYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOURPAYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.95%

-78.99%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.34%

-56.97%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.99%

-68.70%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.68%

-78.99%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.99%

-74.45%

+6.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-26.88%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.22%

37.44%

+1.78%

Volatility

FOUR vs. PAYC - Volatility Comparison

Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) has a higher volatility of 19.73% compared to Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) at 15.60%. This indicates that FOUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOURPAYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.73%

15.60%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.74%

29.94%

+15.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.60%

37.77%

+15.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.20%

44.49%

+11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.44%

44.49%

+12.95%

Dividends

FOUR vs. PAYC - Dividend Comparison

FOUR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
1.09%0.94%0.73%0.54%

Financials

FOUR vs. PAYC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shift4 Payments, Inc. and Paycom Software, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B202220232024202520260
571.90M
(FOUR) Total Revenue
(PAYC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FOUR and PAYC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOUR has higher volatility (19.73%) compared to PAYC (15.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOUR dropped -69.95% vs PAYC's -78.99%.

FOUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.08 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOUR and PAYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer