FOTO vs. WZRD
FOTO (Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF) and WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOTO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle, while WZRD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle. Both are actively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FOTO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for WZRD.
Performance
FOTO vs. WZRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FOTO
- 1D
- 4.81%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
WZRD
- 1D
- 9.38%
- 1M
- -63.54%
- 6M
- -94.02%
- YTD
- -95.23%
- 1Y
- -95.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -94.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.45M | $6.59M | $20.09M | |
| $29.29K | $34.01K | $31.50K |
FOTO vs. WZRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | -23.30% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -87.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOTO and WZRD is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOTO vs. WZRD — Risk / Return Rank
FOTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WZRD
FOTO vs. WZRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOTO | WZRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.56 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -2.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOTO vs. WZRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, smaller than the maximum WZRD drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and WZRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOTO | WZRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -96.46% | +55.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -96.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.07% | -96.13% | +66.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.66% | -33.36% | +13.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 46.45% | — |
Volatility
FOTO vs. WZRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOTO | WZRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 71.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 99.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.72% | 97.42% | -16.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.72% | 93.05% | -12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.72% | 93.05% | -12.33% |
FOTO vs. WZRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WZRD's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOTO vs. WZRD - Dividend Comparison
FOTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 27.01% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOTO and WZRD have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FOTO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOTO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 27.01%, compared with 0.00% for FOTO.
FOTO is categorized as Technology Equities, while WZRD is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 1.07% for WZRD.
Find the right allocation for FOTO and WZRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer