FOTO vs. FTXL
FOTO (Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOTO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. FOTO is actively managed, while FTXL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FOTO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
FOTO vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FOTO
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -13.36%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -7.98%
- 6M
- 70.48%
- YTD
- 91.84%
- 1Y
- 153.01%
- 3Y*
- 51.84%
- 5Y*
- 31.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FOTO vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | -15.47% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | -4.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOTO and FTXL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOTO vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
FOTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTXL
FOTO vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOTO | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOTO vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -28.53%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOTO | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.53% | -43.87% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.92% | -16.35% | -6.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -10.54% | -4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.23% | — |
Volatility
FOTO vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOTO | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.14% | 43.59% | +33.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.14% | 37.71% | +39.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.14% | 35.02% | +42.12% |
FOTO vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOTO vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
FOTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.10% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOTO and FTXL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FOTO.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for FOTO.
FOTO is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 0.60% for FTXL.
Find the right allocation for FOTO and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer