FOBAX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FOBAX (Tributary Balanced Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FOBAX returned 7.05%/yr vs 9.50%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FOBAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

FOBAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOBAX achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.89% return.

FOBAX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: 11.80%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: 8.92%

PALDX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 9.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOBAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FOBAX Tributary Balanced Fund	3.63%	10.30%	14.28%	17.11%	-15.11%	16.27%	12.64%	21.41%	-2.11%	4.67%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.89%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FOBAX and PALDX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017	0.94

The correlation between FOBAX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FOBAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOBAX

FOBAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FOBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FOBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FOBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FOBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FOBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 83
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOBAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FOBAX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.76	-0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.95	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.52	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	3.65	-1.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.35	17.34	-6.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FOBAX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOBAX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FOBAX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.76	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.79	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.81	-0.08

Drawdowns

FOBAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOBAX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOBAX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.00%	-26.16%	-13.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-5.96%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.97%	-16.06%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.88%	-20.47%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-4.09%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.35%	1.25%	+0.10%

Volatility

FOBAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX) is 1.50%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that FOBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOBAX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.50%	2.29%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.51%	6.19%	-0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.14%	7.91%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.42%	12.11%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.96%	12.70%	-1.74%

FOBAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOBAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOBAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

FOBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.51%, more than PALDX's 5.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOBAX Tributary Balanced Fund	9.51%	9.82%	5.32%	5.36%	5.59%	8.10%	5.80%	4.43%	7.55%	8.29%	6.73%	0.22%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.02%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOBAX and PALDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FOBAX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FOBAX or PALDX?

PALDX has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to FOBAX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOBAX dropped -40.00% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.