FOBAX vs. FSMBX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FOBAX (Tributary Balanced Fund) and FSMBX (Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - FOBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Tributary Funds, while FSMBX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Tributary Funds. Over the past 5 years, FOBAX returned 6.57%/yr vs 5.25%/yr for FSMBX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FOBAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FSMBX.

Performance

FOBAX vs. FSMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX) and Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOBAX achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly lower than FSMBX's 12.87% return.

FOBAX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 3.30%
• YTD: 4.38%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 10.54%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 8.75%
• ALL TIME*: 8.29%

FSMBX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 6.49%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 1Y: 13.27%
• 3Y*: 6.44%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FOBAX Tributary Balanced Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSMBX Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FOBAX vs. FSMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FOBAX Tributary Balanced Fund	4.38%	10.30%	14.28%	17.11%	-15.11%	16.27%	12.64%	6.07%
FSMBX Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund	12.87%	-5.43%	9.81%	15.38%	-13.81%	33.39%	12.72%	10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FOBAX and FSMBX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.83

The correlation between FOBAX and FSMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FOBAX vs. FSMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOBAX

FOBAX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FOBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FOBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FOBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FOBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FOBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FSMBX

FSMBX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FSMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FSMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FSMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FSMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOBAX vs. FSMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX) and Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOBAX	FSMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	0.69	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.12	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.13	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	0.97	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.73	2.52	+4.21

FOBAX vs. FSMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the FSMBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOBAX and FSMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FOBAX vs. FSMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, which is greater than FSMBX's maximum drawdown of -37.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOBAX and FSMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOBAX	FSMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.00%	-37.37%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-10.79%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.97%	-25.22%	+13.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.88%	-25.22%	+5.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-1.40%	+0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-7.60%	+3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.40%	4.13%	-2.73%

Volatility

FOBAX vs. FSMBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX) is 1.77%, while Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that FOBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOBAX	FSMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	3.40%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.72%	10.34%	-4.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.45%	15.16%	-7.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.43%	18.70%	-8.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.95%	21.76%	-10.81%

FOBAX vs. FSMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOBAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMBX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOBAX vs. FSMBX - Dividend Comparison

FOBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than FSMBX's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOBAX Tributary Balanced Fund	9.46%	9.82%	5.32%	5.36%	5.59%	8.10%	5.80%	4.43%	7.55%	8.29%	6.73%	0.22%
FSMBX Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund	0.54%	0.61%	0.14%	0.28%	1.83%	3.47%	0.23%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOBAX and FSMBX in my portfolio?

FOBAX and FSMBX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FOBAX or FSMBX?

FSMBX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to FOBAX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOBAX dropped -40.00% vs FSMBX's -37.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.