PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNUC vs. ZIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FNUC vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. (FNUC) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNUC achieves a -39.33% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 23.83% return.


FNUC

1D
-3.19%
1M
-15.74%
YTD
-39.33%
6M
-47.25%
1Y
-44.85%
3Y*
-61.43%
5Y*
10Y*

ZIM

1D
0.63%
1M
0.75%
YTD
23.83%
6M
25.00%
1Y
63.49%
3Y*
52.69%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNUC vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FNUC
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc.
-39.33%-75.96%-17.95%-48.68%-60.42%-49.91%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
23.83%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%13.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FNUC and ZIM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.18

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNUC vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNUC
FNUC Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FNUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNUC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FNUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNUC Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNUC vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. (FNUC) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNUCZIMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.26

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

2.14

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

5.37

-6.58

FNUC vs. ZIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNUC Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNUC and ZIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNUC vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNUC drawdown since its inception was -98.93%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNUC and ZIM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNUCZIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.93%

-84.68%

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.45%

-29.84%

-41.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.50%

-57.12%

-37.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.92%

-10.93%

-87.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.68%

-39.75%

-46.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.84%

11.87%

+30.97%

Volatility

FNUC vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. (FNUC) has a higher volatility of 26.39% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) at 11.95%. This indicates that FNUC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNUCZIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.39%

11.95%

+14.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.56%

36.65%

+33.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.90%

52.44%

+48.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

212.66%

65.73%

+146.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

212.66%

67.47%

+145.19%

Dividends

FNUC vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

FNUC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FNUC
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
4.92%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%

Financials

FNUC vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
1.40B
(FNUC) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FNUC values in CAD, ZIM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


FNUC and ZIM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNUC has higher volatility (26.39%) compared to ZIM (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNUC dropped -98.93% vs ZIM's -84.68%.

ZIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNUC and ZIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer