PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNK vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNK vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNK achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FNK has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 10.03%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.


FNK

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.77%
6M
9.21%
YTD
14.72%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.03%
ALL TIME*
9.34%

RDVY

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.71%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$141.83K$192.54K$284.84K
$77.65M$79.19M$83.63M

FNK vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
14.72%5.65%6.65%21.03%-7.24%33.60%1.23%20.56%-14.72%11.81%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
17.25%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FNK and RDVY is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.85

The correlation between FNK and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNK vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNK
RDVY

Financial Services

26.5%
38.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.8%
11.1%

Industrials

10.2%
12.5%

Energy

8.8%
2.8%

Real Estate

7.1%

-

Technology

7.1%
19.4%

Basic Materials

6.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
2.8%

Utilities

4.9%
1.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
5.6%

Communication Services

1.3%
4.2%

Financial Services

FNK
26.5%
RDVY
38.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FNK
16.8%
RDVY
11.1%

Industrials

FNK
10.2%
RDVY
12.5%

Energy

FNK
8.8%
RDVY
2.8%

Real Estate

FNK
7.1%
RDVY

-

Technology

FNK
7.1%
RDVY
19.4%

Basic Materials

FNK
6.2%
RDVY

-

Consumer Defensive

FNK
5.3%
RDVY
2.8%

Utilities

FNK
4.9%
RDVY
1.4%

Healthcare

FNK
4.4%
RDVY
5.6%

Communication Services

FNK
1.3%
RDVY
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNK vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNK
FNK Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNK Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNK vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNKRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.25

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

13.63

-6.18

FNK vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNK and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNK vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNK drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNK and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNKRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.70%

-40.60%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-9.04%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-19.11%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-25.32%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.70%

-40.60%

-10.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

0.00%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-4.95%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.15%

+0.91%

Volatility

FNK vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNKRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.53%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

11.46%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

14.65%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.89%

18.92%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.75%

21.03%

+2.72%

FNK vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNK vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.43%1.53%1.63%1.76%1.66%1.27%1.61%1.82%1.76%1.40%1.38%1.45%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNK and RDVY have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNK has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNK dropped -50.70% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.25% vs 10.03% for FNK. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.

FNK has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

FNK is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNK and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNK and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer