FNGU vs. YINN

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) and YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while YINN is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FNGU returned 11.04% vs -37.98% for YINN. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNGU charges 2.60%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for YINN.

Performance

FNGU vs. YINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -33.90% return.

FNGU

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: -5.11%
• 6M: 29.10%
• YTD: 10.29%
• 1Y: 11.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.46%

YINN

• 1D: -3.53%
• 1M: 9.93%
• 6M: -35.93%
• YTD: -33.90%
• 1Y: -37.98%
• 3Y*: -5.40%
• 5Y*: -37.22%
• 10Y*: -20.67%
• ALL TIME*: -17.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	10.29%	3.02%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	-33.90%	5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and YINN is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.34

FNGU vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGU	YINN
Technology	60.6%	5.9%
Communication Services	29.8%	17.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	25.3%
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.8%
Energy	-	4.8%
Financial Services	-	35.2%
Healthcare	-	2.6%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	1.0%
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 15
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 13

YINN

YINN Risk / Return Rank: 4
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGU	YINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	-0.64	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	-0.69	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.92	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	-0.62	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.42	-1.23	+1.65

FNGU vs. YINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the YINN Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and YINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -61.30%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and YINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	YINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.30%	-98.87%	+37.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	-61.64%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-69.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-94.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.93%	-97.66%	+74.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.44%	-68.69%	+46.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.14%	30.89%	-4.75%

Volatility

FNGU vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) have volatilities of 18.17% and 18.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	YINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.17%	18.40%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.37%	43.29%	+10.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.82%	59.89%	+4.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.79%	94.28%	-14.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.79%	81.59%	-1.80%

FNGU vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is higher than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGU vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	1.35%	1.12%	1.81%	4.17%	1.16%	0.73%	0.76%	1.38%	1.02%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGU and YINN in my portfolio?

FNGU and YINN have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGU or YINN?

YINN has higher volatility (18.40%) compared to FNGU (18.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -61.30% vs YINN's -98.87%.

Which ETF is better, FNGU or YINN?

On 1-year performance, FNGU leads with 11.04% vs -37.98% for YINN. On fees, YINN is cheaper at 1.52% per year. On volatility, FNGU has been the lower-risk option at 18.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGU or YINN?

Over the 1-year period, FNGU has performed better with a 11.04% return vs -37.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGU or YINN?

YINN is cheaper with a 1.52% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGU or YINN?

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between FNGU and YINN?

FNGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YINN is China Equities. FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 2.60% for FNGU and 1.52% for YINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.