FNGU vs. XXXX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) and XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%) while XXXX tracks the S&P 500 Index (400%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FNGU returned 4.83% vs 53.60% for XXXX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNGU charges 2.60%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for XXXX.

Performance

FNGU vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a -5.42% return, which is significantly lower than XXXX's 13.49% return.

FNGU

• 1D: -2.13%
• 1M: -23.18%
• YTD: -5.42%
• 6M: -10.36%
• 1Y: 4.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XXXX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -11.06%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 7.48%
• 1Y: 53.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	-5.42%	3.02%
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	13.49%	3.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and XXXX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.80

The correlation between FNGU and XXXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 11
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 10

XXXX

XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 34
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGU	XXXX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	1.10	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	1.60	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.21	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	1.45	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.19	5.32	-5.13

FNGU vs. XXXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the XXXX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and XXXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -61.30%, roughly equal to the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and XXXX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	XXXX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.30%	-62.27%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	-37.25%	-22.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.91%	-14.76%	-19.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.34%	-11.56%	-10.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.35%	10.10%	+15.25%

Volatility

FNGU vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 31.97% compared to MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) at 19.26%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	XXXX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.97%	19.26%	+12.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.55%	39.05%	+13.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.38%	49.16%	+15.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.99%	61.09%	+19.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.99%	61.09%	+19.90%

FNGU vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGU vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGU nor XXXX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGU and XXXX in my portfolio?

FNGU and XXXX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGU or XXXX?

FNGU has higher volatility (31.97%) compared to XXXX (19.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -61.30% vs XXXX's -62.27%.

Which ETF is better, FNGU or XXXX?

On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 53.60% vs 4.83% for FNGU. On fees, FNGU is cheaper at 2.60% per year. On volatility, XXXX has been the lower-risk option at 19.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGU or XXXX?

Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 53.60% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGU or XXXX?

FNGU is cheaper with a 2.60% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGU or XXXX?

FNGU and XXXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FNGU and XXXX?

FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while XXXX tracks S&P 500 Index (400%). They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Max. Their fees differ too: 2.60% for FNGU and 2.95% for XXXX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XXXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.